New computational method predicts genes likely to be causal in disease


Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are a critical tool in the detection of genes involved in complex diseases such as diabetes and cancer or traits such as height and obesity. GWASs determine these links by identifying single letter DNA mutations that appear more frequently in individuals with a disease or trait of interest.

However, significant follow-up work is needed to understand the mechanism of action of these mutations. Most disease-associated variants do not alter the function of a gene but instead change the amount of the gene copied in the cells. These studies are unable to determine a causal relationship due to factors such as gene regulation – a genetic variant may instead contribute to altered expression levels of true causal genes, which remain undetected by a GWAS.

A famous example of this issue is a mutation that was identified as strongly linked with obesity. Found near the gene FTO, scientists long assumed that this mutation and FTO were directly linked. However, this was proven untrue last year by Marcelo Nobrega, PhD, associate professor of human genetics, and his team. Instead, the mutation affected the regulation of the gene IRX3, located far away on the genome, which was the actual “obesity” gene.

Now, a new computational method developed by a team led by Hae Kyung Im, PhD, research associate (assistant professor) of genetic medicine, addresses this problem and improves the detection of genes that are likely to be causal for complex diseases and biological traits. The method, PrediXcan, estimates gene expression levels across the whole genome – a better measure of biological action than single mutations – and integrates it with GWAS data. PrediXcan has the potential to identify gene targets for therapeutic applications faster and with greater accuracy than traditional methods. It is described online in Nature Genetics on Aug 10, 2015.


Hae Kyung Im, PhD, research associate (assistant professor) of genetic medicine

“PrediXcan tells us which genes are more likely to affect a disease or trait by learning the relationship between genotype, gene expression levels from large-scale transcriptome studies, and disease associations from GWAS studies,” said Im. “This is the first method that accounts for the mechanisms of gene regulation, and can be applied to any heritable disease or phenotype.”

Transcriptome studies such as the National Institute of Health’s Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) program aim to overcome this limitation by studying gene expression levels and regulation mechanisms and their relationship with diseases, instead of only DNA sequence. But transcriptome studies also have significant limitations, such an inability to determine reverse causality – whether gene expression levels are altered by disease, or whether disease arises due to altered gene expression.

To develop a method of detecting associations between genes and traits that avoids these issues, Im and her colleagues integrated both transcriptome and GWAS data into a single computational framework, which they named PrediXcan. The method uses algorithms to learn how genome sequence influences gene expression, based on large-scale transcriptome datasets such as GTEx. This can then be used to create estimates of gene expression levels from any whole genome sequence or chip dataset.

Genomes that have been sequenced as part of a GWAS can be run through PrediXcan to generate a gene expression level profile, which is then analyzed to determine the association between gene expression levels and the disease states or the trait of interest being studied.

The method not only can identify potentially causal genes, it can determine directionality – whether high or low levels of expression might cause the disease or trait. As calculations are based on DNA sequence data and not physical measurements, it can tease apart the genetically determined component of gene expression from the effects of the trait itself (avoiding reverse causality) and other factors such as environment. With PrediXcan, validation studies only need to test a few thousand genes at most, instead of millions of potential single mutations. In addition, the method can be used to reanalyze existing genomic datasets with a focus on mechanism in a high-throughput manner, addressing a major gap in GWAS studies.

“This integrates what we know about consequences of genetic variation in the transcriptome in order to discover genes, instead of just looking at mutations,” Im said. “In a way, we’re modeling one mechanism through which genes affect disease or traits, which is the regulation of gene expression level.”

While PrediXcan can discover links between genes and traits in a high-throughput manner, Im notes that because it creates estimates based on genome sequence data, it is most accurate for strongly heritable traits. However, almost every complex trait or disease has a genetic component. The method can be used to predict the influence of that component, reducing the complexity of follow-up studies.

Im is now working to improve the prediction of PrediXcan and applying it to mental health disorders. In addition, she is working to expand it beyond gene expression levels, to predict the links between diseases or traits and protein levels, epigenetics and other measurements that can be estimated based on genomic data.

“GWAS studies have been incredibly successful at finding genetic links to disease, but they have been unable to account for mechanism,” Im said. “We now have a computational method that allows us to understand the consequences of GWAS studies.”


The study, “A gene-based association method for mapping traits using reference transcriptome data,” was funded by the National Institutes of Health. Additional authors include Eric R Gamazon, Heather E Wheeler, Kaanan P Shah, Sahar V Mozaffari, Keston Aquino-Michaels, Robert J Carroll, Anne E Eyler, Joshua C Denny, the GTEx Consortium, Dan L Nicolae and Nancy J Cox.

About Kevin Jiang (147 Articles)
Kevin Jiang is a Science Writer and Media Relations Specialist at the University of Chicago Medicine. He focuses on neuroscience and neurosurgery, orthopedics, psychology, genetics, biology, evolution, biomedical and basic science research.
%d bloggers like this: